Legal
Legal update - Thrid Parties Rights Bill: Straight to the point
The Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill went to the House of Lords late last year, aimed at updating the Third Parties Act of 1930. Terry Donaghy looks at the implications this has for insurers.
News analysis - Jackson report: In decent proposals
Andrew Parker examines the proposals unveiled last week by the Jackson report and considers the implications they hold for insurers, claimants and the legal sector.
Lovells backs compensation for terror victims
MoJ announce Bristish victims of terror attacks overseas eligible for compensation
Allianz: Jackson review will lead to return of underwriting-led pricing
Claims manager Roy Hebburn welcomes report
RBSI: Jackson review to lower premiums and cut costs
Jackson Review will benefit claimants in personal injury cases.
LEIG reveals Jackson review concerns
Group claims the report is a “step too far”
AMA accuses Jackson report of “reducing access to justice”
Accident Management Association slams Review of Civil Litigation Costs
Law firm reveals concerns over Jackson review
Addleshaw Goddard outlines civil litigation costs “reservations”
Change in recoverability of ATE premiums significant to Jackson proposals
Stevens & Bolton: Review not so good for claimants
Solicitors claim civil costs review benefits insurers
Thompsons: Insurers have got everything they lobbied for
Post Magazine 14 January 2010
This issue featured an interview with new FSA insurance sector boss Ken Hogg, a focus on motor premium payments, major loss and comprehensive legal update on vicarious liability, care costs, limitation periods and brand protection and all the latest news…
Foil: Jackson report represents a “new era” in civil litagtion
Lawyer body calls on stakeholders to fully consider implications of final report
Jackson review “misses the point”
Apil voice concern for claimants.
Insurers confirm pleural plaques appeal
ABI's Nick Starling said there are "good grounds for this appeal".
MDU responds to report on civil litigation costs
Lord Justice Jackson’s final report believed to be well-considered.
Law firm praises "bold but realistic" Jackson review
Browne Jacobson calls for industry to supprt reform
Lawyers warn insurers of downsides to Jackson review
RPC highlights "hugely controversial" impact of costs review
Final Jackson report calls for qualified one way cost shifting
Review of civil litigation costs could lead to a drop in demand for ATE insurance