No reason to sell out

Before the Financial Services Authority took over from the General Insurance Standards Council, folk...

Before the Financial Services Authority took over from the General Insurance Standards Council, folk were rushing to exit the market, only to find that the regulator extended the application process and succeeded in making a total hash of things.

Once again there are some looking for the exit, this time under the auspices of a tax change, and once again it would be folly to sell.

Many are still unable to see that the 'take out' formula is not designed to benefit the seller - something no one appears to be prepared to discuss. It seems bizarre how so many business owners are prepared to take a discounted price for a company worth substantially more by any standards.

No other business in any other industry would be sold on the basis of the take out formula used for buying insurance brokers.

The problem is not a surplus of brokers, far from it, the problem is clearly with the insurers and their inability, save for a few forward thinking companies, to come into the 21st century.

The industry has decimated its reputation with rhetoric and false promises to the paying public and succumbed to the lowest levels of advertising to secure business from the 'unsuspecting' personal and commercial lines sectors.

The FSA's complete inability to understand insurance and focus on supporting large firms to the clear detriment of the smaller ones continues unabated. Many small brokers have become so upset that they think clearing their desk is the only option; if it means selling their respective businesses for a sixpence then so be it. This decision seems neither rational nor professional.

However, if more brokers accepted the benefits of sub-broking, particularly with their own kind, they would be a force to contend with. It would allow them to keep their own business and, most importantly, their independence, while at the same time reducing their overheads through sharing facilities and outsourcing more effectively.

These are not major basis changes to adopt but will be way more beneficial that selling out at the bottom.

It is a tough, emotionally draining, if not traumatic, process to reach the point where putting the 'for sale' sign up appears to be the only option.

As a company, we think the tax changes proposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer are a total reversal of the government's purported understanding of the entrepreneurial spirit to which it was so enthusiastic in its earlier days, and should not be used to generate a panic sale.

It is darkest before the dawn, and there is huge potential for every small broker - if they are prepared to look outside the box.

Robert D Marshall, Director, Advanced Insurance Centres Limited, Ilford, Essex

- Letters can be sent to: The Editor, Incisive Media, 32-34 Broadwick Street, London W1A 2HG, by fax on: 020 7316 9313, or by e-mail to: jonathan.swift@incisivemedia.com.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sam Woods, Prudential Regulation Authority

Sam Woods, CEO of the Prudential Regulation Authority, has soared up Insurance Post’s Power List 2025 by fearlessly pushing back against successive governments’ political posturing and understanding the burden of red tape.

FCA’s premium finance conundrum: act or step back?

Editor’s View: With falling premiums, a stalled government motor insurance taskforce, and jittery markets, Emma Ann Hughes wonders if no action is now the most likely outcome of the Financial Conduct Authority’s premium finance market review.

Insurance complaints take a slight dip

The Financial Conduct Authority’s latest data has shown insurance and pure protection complaints decreased 6% from 764,272 in the first half of 2024 to 718,496 in the second half.

Solvent exit planning: a crucial step for insurers

While the regulator has postponed the implementation date for the solvent exit planning rules for insurers to 30 June 2026, Sarah Ouarbya, partner for risk consulting and regulatory compliance at Forvis Mazars, warns providers shouldn't put off producing comprehensive and well-documented plans.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here