Post Blog: A gentleman's agreement?

Business handshake

How can brokers with appointed representative arrangements deal with partners undergoing M&A activity? John Rusby explains.

The market is expecting another round of broker consolidation and restructuring in the next 12 montha. Poor economic conditions and further regulatory control will undoubtedly force the pace of mergers and acquistions but little is heard of the impact on those ancillary relationships that surround many brokers.

Many experienced practitioners have found a safe haven in the form of an appointed representative arrangement with a known broker where they can continue to trade in the manner they have been accustomed to. They rarely tend to have formal agreements in place with their broker partners preferring to rely instead on ‘gentlemen's agreements'.

What happens to those individuals who have worked alongside a directly authorised broker in good faith who then finds the broker sells from under them? What happens to their book of business and the client relationships they've worked hard for years to build? Will that individual be forced to work for the new owner with little or no control over the future direction of the business or indeed his own clients? The crunch question becomes whose business it actually is. At times of M&A activity the perceived safe haven becomes a rather unsettled outlook.

For those who have chosen to take this route a formal agreement should be in place with a legal framework protecting all parties and their future interests. Whilst these agreements are not mandatory, each party will benefit as it would identify client ownership, decision-making authority, trading protocols, remuneration, dispute resolution and any termination process. Gentlemen's agreements are all well and good until a dispute arises when inevitably the minor party will suffer.

For those who face the threat of consolidation or are concerned that their current arrangements may not give them the protection they need should think carefully as to their future. Individuals should be satisfied that the agreements they have with their employers or broker partners are fit for purpose and don't leave their futures exposed and out in the cold. This wealth warning is intended to avoid an underclass of insurance professionals appearing as a result of future M&A activity.

John Rusby, director, Ten Insurance

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Government to consult on leasehold commission ban

In a written statement published yesterday, the Minister of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government has said the government “will go out to consultation very shortly on the detail of the Act’s ban on buildings insurance remuneration”.

Diary of an Insurer: Clear’s Claire Thompson

Claire Thompson, senior corporate account handler and hybrid account executive in the broking and sales team at Clear Doncaster, walks her Springer Spaniel, tackles CrossFit plus prepares for being a full-time account executive.

Big Interview: Clarissa Franks, Lockton

Clarissa Franks, head of UK retail for Lockton, speaks to Scott McGee about her first year at the broker, the joy of not being “tied up in numbers and margin”, and shares how her team is “doubling down” to achieve growth.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here